BLOG POST

A Comparative Analysis of Anti-Deforestation Regulations Across the Globe

EUDR Compliance

Last edited: August 12, 2024

Published: January 18, 2024

Orbify Team

Orbify Team

Earth Intelligence Specialists

Deforestation, a critical environmental challenge, has prompted various countries to implement regulations aimed at protecting their forests. This editorial examines and compares the anti-deforestation regulations of several key countries, focusing on the European Union's Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), Brazil, Indonesia,Us, and Australia to understand their approaches and effectiveness in curbing deforestation.

The European Union: A Pioneer with the EUDR


The EU's Deforestation Regulation represents a significant stride in environmental policy. It mandates stringent due diligence for companies to ensure their products, including timber, soy, cocoa, and palm oil, do not contribute to deforestation or forest degradation. This regulation places the onus of environmental responsibility on companies and their supply chains, reflecting the EU's commitment to combat climate change and biodiversity loss​​.

Brazil: A Focus on Indigenous Reserves and Law Enforcement


Brazil, home to a large portion of the Amazon rainforest, has implemented several initiatives to reduce deforestation. The country expanded its network of indigenous reserves and protected areas, encompassing more than half of Brazil’s Amazon forest. These areas are effectively protected, with indigenous peoples controlling 20 percent of the Brazilian Amazon. Additionally, strong enforcement of logging laws, including seizures of illegal timber and closing of illegal sawmills, demonstrates Brazil's commitment to halting deforestation. The country's approach combines environmental protection with socio-economic development, showcasing a model that balances conservation with human needs​​.

Indonesia: Struggling with Enforcement and Policy Implementation

Indonesia, while having strong environmental policies and constitutional provisions for forest management, faces challenges in implementing and enforcing these laws. Historical issues, such as rampant logging and the concentration of timber concessions, have contributed to significant deforestation. Even with international cooperation efforts like the Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA) with the EU, Indonesia struggles with slash-and-burn land-clearing practices for palm oil plantations and weak enforcement of protective designations for high conservation value areas​​.

Anti-Deforestation Laws in the United States


In the United States, efforts to combat deforestation and protect forests are multifaceted. The introduction of the FOREST Act, which stands for "Fostering Overseas Rule of Law and Environmentally Sound Trade Act," is a notable step. This bipartisan bill aims to end the role of U.S. agribusiness in enabling illegal deforestation globally by prohibiting agricultural commodities produced on illegally deforested land from entering the U.S. market. The FOREST Act also seeks to empower countries to protect their own forests by establishing a fund offering conservation support, with an initial budget of $20 million​​​​.


Additionally, the U.S. has a range of laws and regulations under Title 16: United States Code titled Conservation, covering public land management, including forest conservation. These laws include the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act of 1960, and the National Forest Management Act of 1976. The Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act also contribute indirectly to forest conservation​​.


The U.S. is also actively involved in international efforts to combat deforestation and biodiversity loss, as evidenced by the commitments outlined in the 2022 National Security Strategy and other initiatives such as the Global Environment Facility​​.

Anti-Deforestation Laws in Australia


In Australia, deforestation is controlled indirectly by federal law, primarily through the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. This act may apply if there are federally protected threatened species or endangered ecological communities present on the land in question. Additionally, the Illegal Logging Prohibition Act 2012 and the Illegal Logging Prohibition Regulation 2012 target the illegal timber trade and promote legal timber products​​​​.


Land clearing, a significant cause of deforestation in Australia, is now controlled by legislation in various states such as Western Australia, South Australia, Victoria, New South Wales, and Queensland. These laws differ substantially between jurisdictions. Despite increased awareness of the effects of land degradation, controls on clearing have faced opposition from farmers. However, since the 1980s, the rate of land clearing has declined due to changing attitudes and greater awareness of the damaging effects of clearing​​.


Despite these efforts, Australia continues to face significant deforestation challenges, especially for agricultural expansion, logging, mining, and urban development. Deforestation in Australia is a major contributor to biodiversity loss, with many species, including the koala, at risk of extinction due to habitat loss​​​​.

Comparative Insights

European Union: Comprehensive Supply Chain Regulation

Brazil: Emphasis on Law Enforcement and Indigenous Rights

Indonesia: Strong Policies, Struggling with Enforcement


United States: Emerging Legislative Action


Australia: Federal and State-Level Legislation with a Focus on Illegal Logging

Comparative Insights


Regulatory Focus:


Challenges:


Global and Local Impacts:


Community and Indigenous Involvement:

In conclusion, each region's approach to combating deforestation reflects its unique environmental, economic, and social contexts. The EU and U.S. exert global influence through supply chain regulations, Brazil combines indigenous rights with strong law enforcement, Indonesia struggles with enforcing robust policies, and Australia faces challenges in harmonizing state and federal laws. These diverse strategies underscore the complexity of the global fight against deforestation and the need for continued adaptation and enforcement of these laws.


Way Forward

To effectively combat global deforestation, a multi-faceted approach is needed, combining regulatory frameworks, law enforcement, community involvement, international cooperation, and sustainable economic development. Each country's efforts contribute to a larger global strategy to preserve forests, combat climate change, and protect biodiversity. However, the challenge remains in harmonizing these efforts, ensuring compliance, and adapting to emerging.

Live Webinar

To help businesses navigate these complexities, we invite you to join our next live webinar, 'EUDR Compliance - A Case Study Approach (Timber SMEs in Indonesia & Brazil)', which will take place next Wednesday, January 23 at 4pm CET. Register now to secure your spot.



Related blog posts

12 mins read

September 30, 2024

EUDR Compliance

7 mins read

September 9, 2024

EUDR Compliance

10 mins read

August 23, 2024

EUDR Compliance

Solutions

Platform

Resources

Community

Company

Customer StoriesPricing